$3.4 Million Slip-and-Fall Verdict Against Paris Las Vegas Casino After Jury Finds Shared Fault

A Clark County, Nevada jury awarded approximately $3.4 million to Jesse Lozano in a slip-and-fall case against the Paris Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas after a 10-day trial in March 2026. Lozano alleged he slipped on a spilled drink on the casino's wet marble floor in 2018, suffering severe back and cervical injuries that required surgery. The jury also assigned Lozano 50% comparative fault, reducing his collectible damages to roughly $1.7 million. The case was tried before Judge Danielle Pieper in Nevada's Eighth Judicial District Court.

Case at a Glance

• Verdict: $3,400,000
• Collectible Amount: $1,700,000 (after 50% comparative negligence reduction)
• Case Type: Slip and Fall / Premises Liability
• Case Number: A-20-823179-C
• Court: Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada
• Judge: Danielle Pieper
• Trial Length: 10 days (March 2026)
• Plaintiff: Jesse Lozano
• Defendant: Paris Hotel and Casino
• Plaintiff Attorney: Ramzy Ladah, Ladah Injury & Car Accident Lawyers
• Defense Attorney: Brandon Lew, Brandon Smerber Law Firm
• Amount Sought: $7.8 million

What Happened at the Paris Las Vegas Casino?

In 2018, Jesse Lozano, then 60 years old, was walking through the main thoroughfare of the Paris Hotel and Casino with his family after attending a show. According to trial testimony, Lozano slipped on a spilled drink on the casino's marble floor.

The fall caused serious injuries, including damage to his cervical spine. Lozano required extensive medical treatment including injections, spinal implants, and surgery. His medical expenses exceeded $2 million.

Why Did the Jury Side with the Plaintiff?

Lozano's attorney, Ramzy Ladah of Ladah Injury & Car Accident Lawyers, argued that the Paris Las Vegas failed to maintain safe conditions for its guests. A central point in the plaintiff's case was the casino's alleged lack of a proper maintenance schedule for its floors, particularly in high-traffic areas with marble surfaces.

Ladah initially sought $7.8 million in damages to account for Lozano's medical expenses, pain and suffering, and the lasting impact of his injuries.

How Did the Defense Respond?

Defense attorney Brandon Lew of Brandon Smerber Law Firm challenged the plaintiff's version of events. The defense argued there was insufficient evidence to prove what Lozano actually slipped on.

In a notable trial tactic, the defense suggested the liquid on the floor may have come from Lozano's own beer or a pocket flask. Despite this argument, the jury ultimately found in favor of the plaintiff, though it assigned significant shared responsibility.

What Does 50% Comparative Negligence Mean for This Nevada Casino Slip-and-Fall Verdict?

While the jury awarded approximately $3.4 million, it also found Lozano 50% at fault for his injuries. Under Nevada's comparative negligence law, a plaintiff's damages are reduced by their percentage of fault. As long as the plaintiff is not more than 50% at fault, they can still recover damages.

In this case, Lozano's 50% share of fault cut his collectible damages roughly in half, bringing the actual recovery to approximately $1.7 million. The finding highlights how comparative negligence can shape the final outcome of a personal injury verdict, even when the jury agrees the defendant bears substantial responsibility.

What This Verdict Means

A $3.4 million verdict against one of the Las Vegas Strip's most recognizable casino properties highlights the real consequences of premises liability failures, even when the jury assigns shared fault. For the plaintiff, a 50% comparative negligence finding still resulted in a substantial recovery of approximately $1.7 million.

Verdicts like this one deserve to be seen. Major Verdict is the only platform where plaintiff attorneys can publicly display their trial results and settlements, for free. Create your profile today and let your record speak for itself. You can also browse the latest verdict news or find a plaintiff attorney in Nevada.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can you still win a slip-and-fall case if you are partially at fault?

A: Yes. In Nevada and many other states, comparative negligence allows a plaintiff to recover damages even if they share some responsibility for the accident. The key threshold in Nevada is that the plaintiff's fault must not exceed 50%. The damages are reduced proportionally based on the plaintiff's share of fault.

Q: What does a casino owe its guests in terms of floor safety?

A: Casinos and other commercial properties have a legal duty to maintain reasonably safe conditions for visitors. This includes regular inspection and cleaning of floors, especially in high-traffic areas. When a property owner fails to address a known hazard or lacks a proper maintenance routine, they may be found liable for resulting injuries.

Q: How are medical expenses handled in slip-and-fall verdicts?

A: Medical expenses are a major component of damages in slip-and-fall cases. Juries consider past medical bills, future treatment costs, and related expenses like rehabilitation. In the Lozano case, medical expenses alone exceeded $2 million, reflecting the severity of spinal injuries that required surgery and implants. For more on how Nevada handles personal injury cases, see our Nevada personal injury resources.