Latest Auto vs Pedestrian Verdict & Settlement News

Browse all verdict news articles related to auto vs pedestrian cases.

05/04/26 May 4th, 2026 - Virginia Auto vs Pedestrian

$1.225M Settlement Reached in Fairfax County Parking Lot Crash That Caused Permanent Loss of Taste and Smell

A 70-year-old plaintiff settled a motor vehicle negligence claim for $1.225 million in Fairfax County Circuit Court on April 14, 2026, after a passing vehicle struck the plaintiff's parked car at full speed in a Burke, Virginia parking lot, launching the parked car onto a raised median where it slammed into the plaintiff who was standing nearby. The settlement was reached shortly after the filing of suit and was secured by Brian Glass of Ben Glass Law in Fairfax, Virginia. The plaintiff suffered traumatic brain injuries, multiple rib fractures, a collapsed lung, and the permanent loss of taste and smell.Case at a Glance Settlement: $1,225,000 Case Type: Motor Vehicle Negligence Court: Fairfax County Circuit Court, Virginia Settlement Date: April 14, 2026 Plaintiff: 70-year-old (name not disclosed) Defendant: Not disclosed Plaintiff Attorney: Brian Glass, Ben Glass Law (Fairfax, VA) Special Damages: $117,980.71How Did the Burke Parking Lot Crash Happen? The collision occurred in a parking lot in Burke, Virginia. A moving vehicle struck the plaintiff's parked car at speed, sending the parked car up onto a raised median in the lot. The plaintiff was standing near the median when the launched vehicle struck the plaintiff and caused a loss of consciousness. The mechanism of injury was unusual. A moving car striking a parked car, with the parked car then striking the standing plaintiff, produced a pedestrian-style impact at significant force. Emergency responders transported the plaintiff to the Inova Fairfax Hospital Trauma Center.What Injuries Did the Plaintiff Suffer? The injuries documented in the case were severe and, in several respects, permanent. The plaintiff sustained: Traumatic brain injuries: a skull fracture, intracranial hemorrhage, and multiple hemorrhagic brain contusions Chest and lung injuries: multiple rib fractures, a collapsed lung, and hemothorax (blood in the chest cavity) Asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss Permanent loss of smell (anosmia) and loss of taste (ageusia) The permanent loss of smell and taste is a defining feature of this case. Anosmia and ageusia are recognized complications of significant head trauma and are generally considered permanent once established. Beyond the obvious quality-of-life impact, the inability to smell smoke, gas, or spoiled food carries real safety consequences for an older plaintiff living independently.What Did Treatment and Recovery Require? The plaintiff was hospitalized for nine days at Inova Fairfax Hospital Trauma Center. After discharge, the plaintiff required two months of professional nursing care at home, along with physical therapy and vestibular rehabilitation to address balance issues stemming from the head and inner-ear injuries. Special damages, the documented medical and out-of-pocket economic losses, totaled $117,980.71.Why Did the Case Settle Before Trial? The case was resolved shortly after the filing of suit. Several factors likely contributed to the early settlement: a clear liability story in which a moving vehicle struck a stationary one, a sympathetic 70-year-old plaintiff with documented trauma-center treatment, and a permanent sensory injury component that is difficult to minimize at trial. For Virginia plaintiff attorneys, the case offers a useful reference point for valuing motor vehicle claims that involve traumatic brain injury alongside permanent sensory loss, particularly in an older plaintiff. The settlement figure of $1.225 million against roughly $118,000 in special damages reflects a multiplier driven heavily by the permanent and quality-of-life injury components rather than by economic loss alone. Additional Virginia personal injury verdicts and settlements are tracked in the Virginia verdict news archive. Settlements like this one deserve to be seen. Major Verdict is the only platform where plaintiff attorneys can publicly display their trial results and settlements, for free. Create your profile today and let your record speak for itself.Frequently Asked Questions Q: Who represented the plaintiff in this Fairfax County settlement? Brian Glass of Ben Glass Law in Fairfax, Virginia represented the plaintiff. The case settled for $1.225 million in Fairfax County Circuit Court shortly after suit was filed. Q: How are permanent loss of taste and smell valued in personal injury cases? Anosmia (loss of smell) and ageusia (loss of taste) are typically classified as permanent quality-of-life injuries with significant non-economic damage value. They affect daily safety and enjoyment of life and often weigh heavily in jury awards or settlement valuations, especially when accompanied by traumatic brain injury, as in this case. Q: Where can I find more Virginia verdicts and settlements? Major Verdict tracks plaintiff verdicts and settlements across Virginia, including results from Fairfax County, Richmond, and Norfolk. The Virginia verdict news archive lists recent cases by jurisdiction and case type.

Elderly woman crossing busy street with walker device

$1.225M Settlement Reached in Fairfax County Parking Lot Crash That Caused Permanent Loss of Taste and Smell

03/18/26 March 18th, 2026 - California Auto vs Pedestrian

$45 Million Settlement After FlyAway Airport Shuttle Strikes Mother and Son in Los Angeles Crosswalk

A Los Angeles trial attorney secured a $45 million trial settlement after a FlyAway airport shuttle bus struck a mother and her adult son as they crossed a marked crosswalk in Los Angeles, leaving the woman with catastrophic brain injuries. The case resolved on March 4, 2025, during trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court, shortly before closing arguments. The result stands as a significant outcome in Los Angeles pedestrian injury litigation and raises pointed questions about municipal liability when cities outsource transportation services.What Happened on August 3, 2023 According to evidence presented at trial, Armida Lincome, 58, and her son Christofer Bishop, 29, were crossing a marked crosswalk with an active walk signal when they were struck by a FlyAway airport shuttle bus operated by driver Douglas Herrera. The lawsuit alleged that Herrera made an unsafe left turn and failed to yield to the pedestrians, who had the legal right of way. Lincome suffered catastrophic brain injuries as a result of the impact. Bishop was also struck in the collision. The case was filed as Armida Lincome and Christofer Bishop v. Four-Season Travel LLC, Douglas Herrera, 9139249 Canada Inc., Bus.com US LLC, Bus.com Leasing LLC, and the City of Los Angeles.The City Could Not Escape Liability One of the central legal questions in the case was whether the City of Los Angeles could shield itself from liability by pointing to the private contractor operating the FlyAway shuttle service. The court rejected that argument. According to plaintiff's counsel, the City could not delegate away its responsibility because operating the airport shuttle is a nondelegable duty under California law. That doctrine holds certain public obligations to a standard that cannot be transferred to a third party, even through a contract. "The City of Los Angeles could not avoid liability because operating the airport shuttle is a nondelegable duty," said Christopher Montes de Oca, lead trial counsel for the plaintiffs. That legal theory proved decisive. Of the $45 million total, approximately $40 million was paid by insurers for the City of Los Angeles, while $5 million came from insurers for Four-Season Travel LLC and the driver.How the Case Resolved The plaintiffs presented their full case at trial before the matter resolved through mediated settlement. According to reports, the parties reached the $45 million agreement shortly before closing arguments were scheduled to be delivered. Trial settlements of this kind, reached after evidence has been presented but before a jury deliberates, often reflect the strength of the plaintiff's case at the close of evidence. Defendants in this posture have seen the full presentation and are weighing their exposure against a final verdict.About Lead Trial Counsel Christopher Montes de Oca Christopher Montes de Oca is a Los Angeles-based plaintiff trial attorney at the Law Offices of Christopher Montes de Oca. He was named Rising Star Trial Lawyer of the Year by the Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles (CAALA), the nation's largest local association of plaintiff trial attorneys. He has been recognized in Best Lawyers in America for Personal Injury Litigation and selected to Super Lawyers, where he ranks among the Top 100 Super Lawyers in Southern California. He also holds an AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating and has been named Whittier Bar Association Member of the Year. This $45 million result adds to a record that already included a nationally recognized eight-figure jury verdict ranked among the Top 50 Car Accident Verdicts and Top 100 Personal Injury Verdicts in the United States for that year. Plaintiff attorneys with records like this one can display their verdicts and settlements publicly on Major Verdict, where the platform lets trial results speak directly to prospective clients and referring attorneys.What This Settlement Signals for Pedestrian Cases Involving Public Transit Pedestrian cases involving government-affiliated transportation tend to be complex. They typically involve questions of sovereign immunity, the scope of public duty, and whether a private operator's negligence can be attributed back to the contracting government entity. The nondelegable duty theory used here has significant implications for plaintiffs in similar cases across California and beyond. When a municipality operates a public transportation service through a private contractor and a pedestrian is seriously injured, this outcome demonstrates that the city's involvement does not disappear simply because the driver's paycheck comes from a private company. For plaintiff attorneys handling pedestrian injury cases in California, this settlement reinforces the value of naming and pursuing the government entity early in litigation, particularly when the transportation function is one the public would reasonably associate with the city itself. Attorneys who track verdict and settlement trends by case type and jurisdiction can browse results across all 50 states at Major Verdict's latest verdict news.Conclusion The $45 million settlement in Lincome and Bishop v. Four-Season Travel LLC et al. reflects what can happen when a plaintiff's trial team builds a complete case and presses a city that cannot legally sidestep responsibility for its transportation services. Armida Lincome crossed a crosswalk with the light in her favor. The jury would have heard that. The city settled before it had to find out how much that fact was worth. If you or someone you love has been seriously injured as a pedestrian, verdicts and settlements like this one show what juries and defendants are willing to reckon with when the evidence is strong and the attorney is prepared. Find a plaintiff lawyer on Major Verdict who has the trial record to back it up.

$45 Million Settlement After FlyAway Airport Shuttle Strikes Mother and Son in Los Angeles Crosswalk

02/26/26 February 26th, 2026 - California Auto vs Pedestrian

$18.8 Million Monterey County Pedestrian Verdict Holds California Accountable for State Parks Crash

A Monterey County jury awarded $18.8 million to a former Rhode Island city councilmember who was struck by a vehicle in a marked crosswalk at Point Lobos State Natural Reserve in 2023. The Monterey County pedestrian verdict against the State of California sends a clear signal about government accountability when public safety fails inside state parks.How the Point Lobos Crash Happened On June 10, 2023, Helen Anthony, then a sitting member of the Providence, Rhode Island City Council, was visiting Point Lobos State Natural Reserve in Monterey County. While walking across a pedestrian crosswalk in broad daylight, she was struck by a vehicle driven by a California State Parks volunteer. The injuries were catastrophic. According to medical testimony presented at trial, Anthony suffered 20 broken ribs and a traumatic brain injury that will permanently affect her quality of life.The State's Defense and a $50,000 Settlement Offer The State of California argued that it did not bear responsibility for Anthony's injuries because the driver was a volunteer for Point Lobos State Natural Reserve, not a state employee. Anthony's legal team pushed back on that defense. During trial, her attorneys presented evidence that the state had previously offered Anthony just $50,000 to settle the case. The jury ultimately rejected the state's position and returned a verdict nearly 376 times that settlement offer. "This verdict makes clear that the State of California cannot escape responsibility by simply labeling someone a volunteer," said attorney Roger Dreyer, who represents Anthony. Dreyer added that the jury found the state failed to properly train and supervise the volunteer driver, and that the failure resulted in lasting consequences.A Career in Public Service Cut Short The Monterey County pedestrian verdict reflects more than a dollar figure. It captures the full scope of what Anthony lost. Anthony had served on the Providence City Council for six years, representing Ward 2 and chairing the council's Finance Committee. On August 1, 2025, she resigned from office to focus on her recovery. "I'm proud to have served Ward 2 and the City of Providence," Anthony wrote in her resignation letter. She noted that the demands of her council role were hindering her ability to heal from the 2023 crash. For a public servant who spent years advocating for schools, city services, and local government, the decision to step down underscores the severity of injuries that a traumatic brain injury and 20 broken ribs impose on daily life.What This Monterey County Pedestrian Verdict Means for Government Accountability This $18.8 million jury award raises questions about how the State of California trains and supervises volunteers who operate vehicles inside state parks. The defense theory that volunteer status shields the state from liability did not persuade the jury. The case also highlights pedestrian safety at California's state parks and natural reserves. Anthony was in a marked crosswalk in broad daylight when she was hit. Visitors to state parks expect a baseline level of safety, and this verdict suggests juries are willing to hold the state accountable when that expectation is not met. A spokesperson for California State Parks could not be reached for comment, according to the East Bay Times.Tracking Major Verdicts Across California and All 50 States Jury awards like the $18.8 million Monterey County pedestrian verdict shape how attorneys prepare cases, how insurers evaluate risk, and how the public understands what serious injury claims are worth at trial. Browsing the latest verdict news on Major Verdict gives both lawyers and the public access to significant outcomes as they happen. Verdicts like this one deserve to be seen. Major Verdict is the only platform where plaintiff attorneys can publicly display their trial results and settlements for free. Create your profile today and let your record speak for itself.

$18.8 Million Monterey County Pedestrian Verdict Holds California Accountable for State Parks Crash

1 of 1 Pages - 3 Total Verdict News Posts Found

Search Verdict News

State Verdict News

Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Verdict Case Types

Member Search

Latest Featured Members

View All Major Verdict Members

Search Members by State

Plaintiff trial attorneys. Join now for free!

ShowcaseYour Experience

Major Verdict gives you a free public profile to showcase your hard-earned trial verdicts and notable settlements. Let your results speak for themselves to potential clients and peers nationwide. You control what you share, when you edit, and how your public record is presented.

Why join

Join now