Skip to main content

Latest Personal Injury Verdict News from Colorado

Browse all personal injury verdict news from Colorado.

Other useful Colorado links: Colorado personal injury resources for the public. Browse some of the most experienced injury attorneys in Colorado.

Toxic Tort
Stone countertop being manufactured

$17.45M Colorado Verdict in First Artificial Stone Silicosis Case

A Denver jury returned a $17,450,000 verdict on April 30, 2026, in Colorado's first artificial stone countertop silicosis case. The jury found that engineered stone manufacturer Cambria Co., LLC and Hyundai USA LLC misrepresented the safety of quartz slabs that left a 31-year-old fabricator with progressive lung disease and chronic kidney disease. The Denver County District Court jury allocated 32% of fault to Cambria and 3% to Hyundai USA, awarding plaintiffs Tyler Jordan and Caitlin Jordan compensation across economic, non-economic, impairment, and consortium damages. Plaintiffs were represented by Evan Hoffman, Leah McMorris, Grecia Perez, and partner James Nevin of Brayton Purcell LLP. The case is only the third artificial stone silicosis matter to reach a verdict anywhere in the United States.Case at a Glance Verdict: $17,450,000 Case Type: Toxic Tort / Product Liability (Artificial Stone Silicosis) Court: Denver County District Court, Colorado (Case No. 2024CV31180) Verdict Date: April 30, 2026 Plaintiffs: Tyler Jordan and Caitlin Jordan Defendants: Cambria Co., LLC (32% liable); Hyundai USA LLC (3% liable) Plaintiff Attorneys: Evan Hoffman, Leah McMorris, Grecia Perez, and James Nevin (Brayton Purcell LLP)What Did the Jury Award? The Denver jury divided the $17,450,000 verdict into four damage categories. Economic damages totaled $7,600,000. Non-economic damages came to $1,650,000. Physical impairment damages reached another $7,600,000. The jury also awarded $600,000 to Caitlin Jordan for loss of consortium. The total reflects the comparative-fault allocation of 32% against Cambria Co., LLC and 3% against Hyundai USA LLC under Colorado's modified comparative fault scheme. No punitive damages were awarded.How Engineered Stone Causes Silicosis Artificial stone, also called engineered stone or quartz countertop slab, is manufactured by binding crushed quartz with polymers and pigments. Quartz is composed almost entirely of crystalline silica. When fabricators cut, grind, and polish slabs to install in kitchens and bathrooms, they generate fine respirable silica dust. Inhaled over time, that dust scars lung tissue and causes silicosis, an irreversible and often progressive disease that can also damage the kidneys. Tyler Jordan was 31 years old at the time of the verdict. According to court filings, his exposure to silica during stone fabrication caused both artificial stone silicosis and silica-related chronic kidney disease, along with respiratory impairment.Why the Jury Held Cambria and Hyundai USA Liable The plaintiffs' theory of liability against both defendants rested on misrepresentation. Brayton Purcell argued that Cambria and Hyundai USA marketed their products as "pure natural quartz" without warning fabricators or end users of the extreme respiratory and kidney hazards generated when the engineered slabs are cut and polished. The case against Hyundai USA also included a negligence count. The jury agreed, allocating 32% of fault to Cambria Co., LLC and 3% to Hyundai USA LLC. "This verdict is about accountability," said plaintiff attorney Evan Hoffman of Brayton Purcell LLP. The defendants were represented by Claire Weglarz and Khaled Taqi-Eddin of Womble Bond Dickinson, and by Rey Yang and Johanna Boktor of Yang Professional Law Corporation.Why This Stone Silicosis Verdict Matters Nationally Artificial stone silicosis is an emerging occupational health crisis. Public health agencies have documented a sharp rise in cases among young countertop fabricators, with some progressing to lung transplant or death within a few years of diagnosis. California became the first state to require enhanced workplace protections for stone fabrication shops after a wave of cases there, and other state regulators are following. The Tyler Jordan verdict is the first to reach a Colorado courtroom and only the third nationally. The result is expected to draw additional plaintiff filings in states where stone fabrication shops operate without strict respiratory controls. Brayton Purcell, historically known for asbestos litigation, has built a dedicated stone silicosis team and is actively investigating new cases. The verdict also signals to the engineered stone industry that misrepresentation theories, alleging slabs were sold as "natural quartz" without hazard warnings, can survive trial and produce eight-figure jury awards. Look for similar personal injury verdict news in Colorado as toxic-tort filings continue to climb. If you or someone you love has developed silicosis, lung disease, or kidney disease after working with engineered stone countertops, verdicts like this show what juries are willing to award when manufacturers fail to warn of known hazards. Find a plaintiff lawyer on Major Verdict with the trial record to take on artificial stone silicosis cases.Frequently Asked Questions Q: What is artificial stone silicosis? Artificial stone silicosis is a lung disease caused by inhaling fine crystalline silica dust during the cutting, grinding, and polishing of engineered or "artificial" stone slabs. Engineered stone contains far more silica than natural granite, and exposure can produce severe and progressive lung scarring, sometimes within a few years. Silica exposure can also cause chronic kidney disease, as alleged in the Tyler Jordan case. Q: What were the damages in the Tyler Jordan verdict? The Denver jury awarded $7,600,000 in economic damages, $1,650,000 in non-economic damages, $7,600,000 in physical impairment damages, and $600,000 to Caitlin Jordan for loss of consortium. The $17,450,000 total was allocated under Colorado's comparative fault rules, with Cambria Co., LLC found 32% liable and Hyundai USA LLC found 3% liable. Q: Why is this verdict significant for stone silicosis litigation? It is the first artificial stone silicosis case to reach a verdict in Colorado and only the third nationally. The result confirms that misrepresentation theories, alleging manufacturers marketed engineered stone as "pure natural quartz" without warning of the silica hazard, can produce eight-figure jury awards in this emerging mass tort area.

Premises Liability

$2.7M Federal Jury Verdict Against Target Corp in Colorado Premises Liability Case

A federal jury in Denver awarded $2,698,550 to a customer who tripped over a fallen curbside pickup sign at a Littleton, Colorado Target store a hazard that evidence showed the retail giant knew about for months and failed to fix. The verdict, returned on November 21, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (Case No. 1:23-cv-02828-DDD-STV), found Target Corp 100% responsible for the plaintiff's injuries. The judgment became final after Target Corp did not appeal by the February 19, 2026 deadline.What Happened at Target Store #1776 in Littleton The incident occurred on October 9, 2021, at Target Store #1776, located at 9390 W. Cross Drive in Littleton, Colorado. A temporary curbside pickup sign had blown over earlier that day. Evidence presented at trial showed the sign was visually camouflaged against the surrounding pavement which had been painted in Target's own branding colors making it difficult to see underfoot. That design detail mattered. So did what happened after the sign fell.Target Knew the Signs Were a Problem and Did Nothing The jury heard evidence that Target Corp had been aware for months that these curbside pickup signs were falling over prior to this incident. Video evidence presented at trial showed that multiple Target employees walked near the fallen sign before the customer was hurt. Despite those opportunities, no one removed it, marked it, or cordoned off the area. The plaintiff subsequently tripped over the sign and fell. The jury's finding of 100% liability against Target reflects the conclusion that this was not a sudden, unforeseeable accident. The hazard was known. The risk was documented. And nothing was done.Severe and Permanent Injuries The fall caused the plaintiff to suffer severe nerve damage to the right arm and hand. Medical testimony established that the injuries resulted in permanent impairment and chronic pain, with lasting functional limitations affecting daily life. The jury's award of $2,698,550 covers medical expenses, pain and suffering, and the long-term consequences of those permanent injuries.The Legal Team The plaintiff was represented by Vernon L. Ready of Ready Law, a Colorado personal injury firm based in Denver. The verdict places this case among the more significant premises liability outcomes in the Denver metropolitan area in recent years, according to the press release issued by Ready Law.What This Verdict Means for Retail Premises Liability Cases This case carries meaningful signals for plaintiff attorneys handling retail injury claims in Colorado. The combination of documented prior notice, identifiable corporate branding contributing to the hazard, and video evidence of employees passing the danger point created a strong liability picture. The jury's 100% fault allocation against a major national retailer in federal court underscores that corporations cannot escape responsibility for known, unaddressed hazards simply because the setting is a routine retail environment. For attorneys tracking premises liability verdicts in Colorado, cases like this one illustrate what a well-developed "notice plus failure to act" theory can produce at trial. Plaintiff attorneys can explore Colorado verdict data and connect with experienced trial lawyers at Major Verdict.Find a Colorado Personal Injury Lawyer If you or someone you know has been injured on another person's or business's property in Colorado, you have the right to seek compensation. Colorado's Premises Liability Act imposes specific duties on property owners and occupiers to protect lawful visitors from known hazards. This verdict shows what can happen when those duties are ignored. To find a plaintiff personal injury attorney with a proven trial record in Colorado, visit the Major Verdict member directory a public resource connecting injured people with experienced lawyers across all 50 states. You can also explore Colorado personal injury public resources for more context on how cases like this are handled in your state. Attorneys: if you try cases like this and want your results in front of the public and your peers, join Major Verdict the only platform where plaintiff lawyers publicly display detailed trial outcomes.


Member Search

Latest Featured Members

View All Major Verdict Members
Search Members by State
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6 Sample 7 Sample 8 Sample 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12
Sample 13 Sample 14 Sample 15 Sample 16 Sample 17 Sample 18 Sample 19 Sample 20 Sample 21 Sample 22 Sample 23 Sample 24
Sample 32 Sample 25 Sample 26 Sample 27 Sample 28 Sample 29 Sample 30 Sample 31 Sample 33 Sample 34 Sample 35 Sample 36
Sample 37 Sample 38 Sample 39 Sample 40 Sample 41 Sample 42 Sample 43 Sample 44 Sample 45 Sample 46 Sample 47 Sample 48

Plaintiff trial attorneys. Join now for free!

ShowcaseYour Experience

Major Verdict gives you a free public profile to showcase your hard-earned trial verdicts and notable settlements. Let your results speak for themselves to potential clients and peers nationwide. You control what you share, when you edit, and how your public record is presented.